By using Norwichtalk.com services you agree to our Cookies Use and Data Transfer outside the EU.
We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, ads and Newsletters.

Ricky

Andy

Andy

Active Member
Has he actually gone yet or is he still in the departure lounge?
 
BarclayBoy88

BarclayBoy88

New Member
From the interview with Neil Adams after the game last night, the impression I got was this was Ricky's choice and not the teams. Which if true, is really disappointing. He doesn't want to stay and fight, he'd rather flee to a league that isn't very competitive and is dominated by a couple of big spenders. I'd think his personal pride was dented from last season's goal output, and he'd want to stay and fight but apparently that's not the right assumption. If it was his decision, then we're better off without him, can't carry anyone in the Championship who's not up for it. Still it's a shame, thought he had a lot of potential and another season in a tough league in England would have done him the World of good. 
 
Andy

Andy

Active Member
Report in France say Ricky has passed his medical

http://www.getfootballnewsfrance.com/2014/ricky-van-wolfswinkel-has-passed-a-medical-with-st-etienne/
 
W

windy

New Member
I doubt we will ever get the true story here!! As in Adams claims he wants to keep EVERYONE, and that Ricky starts with a clean slate and even would be welcome back if he does not fancy the loan.

Then we have RVW and his tweets! Appreciate that we may only be reading what we want to see in those tweets, and like Morty has said "its the modern day version of kissing the badge". Just I honestly felt that he was up to the challenge and wished to prove himself!

Just dont know what to think!! My opinion is that a combination of Ricky not playing in the last few games, his squad number changing, the KNOCK which has kept him out of friendlies suggests that Adams does not want him!

But as I have said before... Aslong as NCFC have a really good season then names on the team sheet should not matter!!
 
The Ghost of Michael Theo

The Ghost of Michael Theo

New Member
He is clearly on high wages, and a luxury we can't afford in the Championship. Especially when we don't know if he can return to his Sporting form.

I think Fer will be the same, but hopefully not Redmond.
 
BarclayBoy88

BarclayBoy88

New Member
I don't mind him going on loan, but I think it would be a mistake to put a buy clause in there. If he does return to form and hits 15 odd goals, then his value would be more than the £4.2 million, or whatever it is that is being quoted. 

Still not done though, wonder if it's a case of him taking some time to think about it, or if they can't get the terms of the deal sorted with us.
 
Andy

Andy

Active Member
Must be difficult to negotiate a " if he's *bleep* you can have him for an inflated price, if he turns out decent then we'll have him back" clause in a contract.
 
Yellow Fever

Yellow Fever

New Member
I think the £4.5m is only if no other higher offers come in Barclayboy.
 
BarclayBoy88

BarclayBoy88

New Member
Christophe Gaultier on #ncfc RvW: 'He played against us 2 years ago in a friendly. He hurt us & we all noticed his quality.'

CG: 'At the end of last season we had his name in mind. He is a man with good technical quality which is just like the Dutch.' #ncfc

Only a matter of time now. How closely will everyone he following him in France? I think both BT Sport and Sky Sports have rights to Ligue 1 this season. 
 
The Great Mass Debater

The Great Mass Debater

New Member
I would have much prefered a simple loan fee for his services for the year and then sort the rest. Hard to see how we win with an agreed fee. If he's awful they dont buy him and we're still stuck with him, or if he's great, they get him at a knock down price
 
BarclayBoy88

BarclayBoy88

New Member
Anyone else think the article in the Pink'Un this morning regarding Ricky was a bit of a shitty thing to do, especially considering he hasn't officially left yet and even when he does, it'll be on loan and not a permanent deal. 
 
Canaryboy

Canaryboy

Well-Known Member
Anyone else think the article in the Pink'Un this morning regarding Ricky was a bit of a shitty thing to do, especially considering he hasn't officially left yet and even when he does, it'll be on loan and not a permanent deal. 
I probably shouldn't make a habit of criticising a group of people who probably aren't too fond of me right now, but I wasn't a fan of this article earlier in the year:

Why Norwich Fans Must Not Fall Into The David Fox Trap

Thought it was distasteful considering the player did so much for us in our promotion season, and then in our important first season in the Premier League, and really hadn't been given much of a chance under Hughton. He had just had an excellent game too. Thought it was unnecessary, and comparing him with Cody McDonald and James Vaughan - two players who contributed absolutely nothing to our rise - was just outright disrespectful. 
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BarclayBoy88

BarclayBoy88

New Member
I probably shouldn't make a habit of criticising a group of people who probably aren't too fond of me right now, but I wasn't a fan of this article earlier in the year:

Why Norwich Fans Must Not Fall Into The David Fox Trap

Thought it was distasteful considering the player did so much for us in our promotion season, and then in our important first season in the Premier League, and really hadn't been given much of a chance under Hughton. He had just had an excellent game too. Thought it was unnecessary, and comparing him with Cody McDonald and James Vaughan - two players who contributed absolutely nothing to our rise - was just outright disrespectful. 
I completely agree with you on that one. I actually criticised Lakey on Twitter about that article, in a very polite and well mannered way and instead of addressing the points I made (Which were almost identical to the ones you made above),he blocked me, for just disagreeing with him.  
 
B

bloodwagon

Member
I completely agree with you on that one. I actually criticised Lakey on Twitter about that article, in a very polite and well mannered way and instead of addressing the points I made (Which were almost identical to the ones you made above),he blocked me, for just disagreeing with him.  
Says alot really dont it ?
 
Yellow Fever

Yellow Fever

New Member
I agree with you BarclayBoy, but one third of those voting agree with the headline. I fear the Yellow Army is still a very split entity. Some are just waiting to have a chance to start shouting Adams out if we lose a match. It disturbs me.
 
Yellowfuture

Yellowfuture

New Member
I agree with you BarclayBoy, but one third of those voting agree with the headline. I fear the Yellow Army is still a very split entity. Some are just waiting to have a chance to start shouting Adams out if we lose a match. It disturbs me.




"Some are just waiting to have a chance to start shouting Adams out if we lose a match. It disturbs me."



There are bound to be some like that around after the last 12 months but I really think that they are a minority and things will have to get pretty bad before they will get any traction. The big thing for me is the style of play, if we lose a few and go down fighting the reaction will be different to last seasons losses IMO.
 
skijumptoes

skijumptoes

Active Member
...I'm a little bit hopeful that this move is taking it's time, i'm hoping that St Etienne being so vocal regarding Wolfy joining them has annoyed McNally and he's said 'Sod it! He's playing here if they can't do things in private!'.  

Phone: 'Riccckkkkkkeeey, get back here NOW!!!'   ;)
 
Top