By using Norwichtalk.com services you agree to our Cookies Use and Data Transfer outside the EU.
We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, ads and Newsletters.

Norwich vs Crystal Palace (Home) 8th August 2015

Status
Not open for further replies.
Din

Din

Well-Known Member
Don't know if anyone's going to bother reading this, and considering how long it is I couldn't really blame you but I needed to let off some steam so here we go:

Today perhaps was a bit of a lesson and a reality check for us. In the championship if you make a mistake there's a good chance you'll get away with it, particularly if you're one of the top teams. In the Premier League if you make a mistake, you often don't get away with it, and that was certainly in evidence today. We defended poorly on two occasions, and found ourselves 2-0 down, and that's the way it works in this league.

Lets give Palace their dues, they're a good side. Weren't at it properly for the first 30 minutes or so, but overall they were the better team, and visibly had that extra bit of quality that we lacked. In the likes of Zaha, Puncheon and Cabaye they've got players that will cause even the best teams in this league problems, and although 3-1 was a bit flattering I think they deserved the win. 

The most disappointing thing about today is the fact that the goals were completely avoidable. The first goal just wasn't good enough defensively at all. Watching it back on TGMD's links it's very clear to see what went so wrong. Bassong gets beaten for pace a little too easily for my liking, although I might be being a bit harsh considering Puncheon is quick. Tettey fails to track Jordan Mutch's run into the box, and because of that Whittaker shuffles across to pick him up, leaving Zaha completely unmarked at the back post. Ruddy perhaps could've done slightly better having got a touch to it, but he may well have been blind-sided by Whittaker so don't think we can attach any real blame to him. The second goal though is even worse. Cleverly worked from Palace but the fact that nobody spots Souare's run into the box is pathetic really, he then heads it back across the box (unintentionally by the looks of it) where Delaney has been left unmarked who smashes it. Russell Martin was marking Delaney but watched the ball float towards the edge of the box rather than check how close he was to the man he was marking, the ball was then put back across goal and by that time Delaney was so far away from Martin that there was no way he could get a block in, or get to the ball first. Poor from Russell Martin. The third goal didn't really matter but it is absolutely pathetic from Martin. He closes down McArthur to stop the shot, jumping in the air and turning his back on play in the process, just as McArthur slips in Cabaye, who Russell Martin was marking, who then goes on and scores. Ridiculous goal, but ultimately the game was already lost by then.

For me personally, our best player was Howson. There were actually quite a few candidates but Howson edges it for me. He didn't actually look all that comfortable out on the right hand side in the first half, but defensively he was solid, doing a lot of the nitty-gritty stuff that often goes unnoticed, and he hardly ever gave the ball away. Hoolahan was superb as well. Caused the Palace defence/midfield a lot of problems, although he did give it away on a couple of occasions a little easily, even for him. He's undoubtedly a crucial player for us though, and will be if we have any chance of survival. Dorrans was also very good, and he formed a nice combination with Howson and Hoolahan that was where practically all our creativity was coming from. Often kept it simple but wasn't afraid to play the long balls out to the wings either, which he did well a number of times. One problem with him though is that defensively he doesn't offer enough, certainly not as much as Howson or Tettey. Robbie Brady impressed me today. The two free-kicks where he went for goal were poor, but aside from that it was hard to fault him. Zaha couldn't get round him in the first 15 minutes or so, hence why from that point onwards he went out to the left to face Whittaker. He was relatively solid all game, and put in a couple of great deliveries. I think he probably offers more in left midfield, but he was good cover for Olsson today. Ruddy also made a couple of good saves, in particular the one from Mutch I think it was when he went through 1-on-1. Perhaps could've done slightly better for Palace's first goal, but it's hard to tell really. Bassong was pretty solid all game, won everything in the air and in general dealt with Murray quite well. Tettey was solid but unspectacular really, and the decision to take him off on a yellow card was the right one, especially with Mulumbu injured. Redmond had a big impact when he came on. Obviously scored a brilliant goal and was heavily involved in general and it's not hard to see why supporters are a little frustrated he didn't start. Jerome didn't have quite as big an impact, but ultimately scored a good goal that was wrongly ruled out, and had it of stood he would've been the hero again.

Our worst player was Bradley Johnson, followed by Martin and then Whittaker. Johnson won a few headers, including one that set-up Jerome for his illegal goal, but lost out in the air more times than he won. On the ball he didn't really do anything of much good, and his movement off the ball was terrible. The number of times that Wes or Dorrans would take the ball into the middle and look for an option on the left hand side, only to find that Johnson had come inside was absurd. I had my doubts about whether he could reproduce last season's success, and based on today's evidence I'm not optimistic. Martin was at fault for Palace's second and third goal, and just isn't good enough in general. He got caught out time after time, and we really need to sign a quality centre back to play alongside Bassong. I like Martin, seems like a nice guy who loves this football club, but the fact is we need quality if we're going to stay up, and he just isn't it. It's not hard to see why Neil likes him, because one thing that he's good at, and did well today was bring the ball out of defence and travel 15/20 yards before playing the pass, but I really hope that isn't enough to convince Neil to stick with him. Whittaker was quite good going forwards, and was unlucky as well with his effort that was cleared off the line, but he was humiliated by Zaha time after time, and the same with Bolasie when he came on. He was slow to turn and not great going into tackles either. I understand that Zaha and Bolasie are two very tricky, pacey wingers who any full back in the division would struggle against, but the fact is that is what we're up against this season, and today he didn't look up to it. Grabban blew hot and cold. Some of his link-up play, in particular with Hoolahan in the first half was very good, but that some of it wasn't so good, and he gave the ball away a fair few times. He was also prepared to run the lines which he did reasonably well. I think that people's judgement of his performance has been clouded by that miss in the first half. He wasn't great but he certainly wasn't as bad as some (not really anyone on here, mainly those on Twitter and Canary Call) are making out. The fact is though that in this league you cannot afford to miss chances like that. They are few and far between so when they come your way you really need to take them, and Grabban didn't, and that has always been the problem with him which we all witnessed clearly last season. For me Jerome is the superior player, and if he was fully fit I would've started with him. But the way that Grabban has been written off as 'not good enough' after one Premier League game, where he was by no means our worst player is ridiculous.

I think Alex Neil did reasonably well on his Premier League debut despite the defeat. When I saw the starting line-up I was slightly disappointed, and surprised that he chose to leave out Jerome and Redmond. But I actually think it was a good call. Although it's seen as quite unambitious and negative to play with four central midfielders in a home game against a mid-table team, it was actually working well for us in the first 25 minutes or so, and we were certainly on top. The reason we lost this game was completely down to the defence, nothing to do with the midfield, or rather the fact that Redmond was omitted from it. If we defended better for the first two goals and therefore we don't concede them, then we would've gone onto win the game regardless of the fact that Redmond or Jerome didn't start. Ok, you could argue that Jerome would've stuck Grabban's chance away, but had defended properly I'm sure we would've won the game regardless of that miss. Neil also made exactly the right changes at the right times. I imagine what he was thinking at half time is to leave any substitutions until the hour mark, and if it's still 1-0 then bring on Redmond and Jerome. It was just unfortunate that we turned off from a set-piece and ended up 2-0 down and with a mountain to climb before he could make those changes, but having gone 2-0 down he made them immediately. Had it stayed 1-0 until the hour mark and Redmond and Jerome had come on, I would've been much more confident we could get something from the game. The decision to bring on Hooper for Dorrans with about 10 minutes left was also the correct call, it was just unfortunate that we couldn't really break Palace down and therefore Hooper wasn't really able to get in the game.

As for the referee, what a ****. It is so typical that we get the ref who happens to have never managed in the Premier League before, and you can clearly see why. I didn't get a clear enough view of the penalty appeal for handball because I sit at the other end of the ground, but I have seen Palace fans say they were lucky to get away with it. There is absolutely nothing wrong with Jerome's goal though, and to rule it out for dangerous play is beyond ridiculous. Not only does Ward put his head downwards, but he's behind Jerome, so the only way Jerome's foot can hit Ward is if Ward goes towards it. Just in general though he had a terrible game. Let Palace get away with so much without brandishing a card, and there was absolutely no consistency in the way he did things, for example booking Tettey for bringing down Zaha, and yet a few minutes earlier McArthur went in two footed on Hoolahan, with both feet off the ground, and didn't even get a card. It was unbelievably bad, and I hope he never manages in the Premier League again.

Anyway, onto Sunderland away, which is certainly a game that falls into the 'winnable' category. A lot of supporters seem to be panicking over this defeat, but it's only one bloody game, where we came up against a good side and actually didn't play too badly, not to mention being let down by the referee. There's a long way to go yet and a win against Sunderland (and possibly a signing of a striker or centre back during the week) and suddenly all the fans that have stated how doomed we are after this defeat, will suddenly think we'll be in with a chance of a Champions League place again. 
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dj161

dj161

Well-Known Member
I think Grabban is the better choice when you're away from home, going to have less of the ball and looking to play on the break as he has that extra yard of pace, opening game of the season at home and against a side you need to be looking to pick points up against in a more physical battle it has to be Jerome everytime (as long as he's fit)
 
L

Lavanche

New Member
Grabban could be great bench player as an invert winger when we are chasing or protecting lead as a 9, but dont think he is ahead of Jerome and Hooper as a pure 9. In my opinion at this level we dont have enough goalthreat from midfield apart Redmond and even he might get his chances nulled by better defences.

Johnson wont get as much room nor freedom to roam at top level and I would be surprised if he scored more than 5 from midfield. Howson and Hoolahan mayby have another 5 in them and Dorrans + Mulumbu might score few more, but that leaves quite much to score for our strikers and wingers

In my opinion we didnt strenghten our midfield enough. Apart from Mulumbu we have signed 0 clear starters. That goes ofc for every other department, but in modern football most of the time games are won in midfield.

I also still hope we get premiership level CB to side Bassong. We had great team effort at our own end in last time we were up and even then our CB pairings were shaky under pressure. Selling Turner and signign replacement for our captain should be priority as it seems we wont sign a player to give Hoolahan at least a challenge for his place in the pocket.

Anyway we looked okay today outside defending our wings. Which in my opinion are mostly because wide midfielders were not up to their task today. Well we learn and go forward.  

These players can keep us up if they can play solid good football as a team, but cant see us beat many games as a effort from quality of our players. At this level those few odd goals from out of nowhere and brave creative challenges made by players like Redmond just can mean the difference of be in bottom five or top half.
 
Canaryboy

Canaryboy

Well-Known Member
I don't think our midfield is an issue, and I'm looking forward to seeing Brady in his preferred position. 

I also think that Jerome will soon win his place back as our main striker, and that Hooper will get some football this season, and that Grabban will come in useful as a sub or as part of an adventurous two striker formation. 

I'm just really concerned about Russell Martin.

At his best he was a decent lower Premier League right back. 

He is not, has never been, and never will be a decent lower Premier League centre back.  

He has shown that today and will show it time and time again this year, he'll cost us points, we really need to invest in a quality partner for Bassong. 
 
The Great Mass Debater

The Great Mass Debater

New Member
Don't know if anyone's going to bother reading this, and considering how long it is I couldn't really blame you but I needed to let off some steam so here we go:

Today perhaps was a bit of a lesson and a reality check for us. In the championship if you make a mistake there's a good chance you'll get away with it, particularly if you're one of the top teams. In the Premier League if you make a mistake, you often don't get away with it, and that was certainly in evidence today. We defended poorly on two occasions, and found ourselves 2-0 down, and that's the way it works in this league.

Lets give Palace their dues, they're a good side. Weren't at it properly for the first 30 minutes or so, but overall they were the better team, and visibly had that extra bit of quality that we lacked. In the likes of Zaha, Puncheon and Cabaye they've got players that will cause even the best teams in this league problems, and although 3-1 was a bit flattering I think they deserved the win. 

The most disappointing thing about today is the fact that the goals were completely avoidable. The first goal just wasn't good enough defensively at all. Watching it back on TGMD's links it's very clear to see what went so wrong. Bassong gets beaten for pace a little too easily for my liking, although I might be being a bit harsh considering Puncheon is quick. Tettey fails to track Jordan Mutch's run into the box, and because of that Whittaker shuffles across to pick him up, leaving Zaha completely unmarked at the back post. Ruddy perhaps could've done slightly better having got a touch to it, but he may well have been blind-sided by Whittaker so don't think we can attach any real blame to him. The second goal though is even worse. Cleverly worked from Palace but the fact that nobody spots Souare's run into the box is pathetic really, he then heads it back across the box (unintentionally by the looks of it) where Delaney has been left unmarked who smashes it. Russell Martin was marking Delaney but watched the ball float towards the edge of the box rather than check how close he was to the man he was marking, the ball was then put back across goal and by that time Delaney was so far away from Martin that there was no way he could get a block in, or get to the ball first. Poor from Russell Martin. The third goal didn't really matter but it is absolutely pathetic from Martin. He closes down McArthur to stop the shot, jumping in the air and turning his back on play in the process, just as McArthur slips in Cabaye, who Russell Martin was marking, who then goes on and scores. Ridiculous goal, but ultimately the game was already lost by then.

For me personally, our best player was Howson. There were actually quite a few candidates but Howson edges it for me. He didn't actually look all that comfortable out on the right hand side in the first half, but defensively he was solid, doing a lot of the nitty-gritty stuff that often goes unnoticed, and he hardly ever gave the ball away. Hoolahan was superb as well. Caused the Palace defence/midfield a lot of problems, although he did give it away on a couple of occasions a little easily, even for him. He's undoubtedly a crucial player for us though, and will be if we have any chance of survival. Dorrans was also very good, and he formed a nice combination with Howson and Hoolahan that was where practically all our creativity was coming from. Often kept it simple but wasn't afraid to play the long balls out to the wings either, which he did well a number of times. One problem with him though is that defensively he doesn't offer enough, certainly not as much as Howson or Tettey. Robbie Brady impressed me today. The two free-kicks where he went for goal were poor, but aside from that it was hard to fault him. Zaha couldn't get round him in the first 15 minutes or so, hence why from that point onwards he went out to the left to face Whittaker. He was relatively solid all game, and put in a couple of great deliveries. I think he probably offers more in left midfield, but he was good cover for Olsson today. Ruddy also made a couple of good saves, in particular the one from Mutch I think it was when he went through 1-on-1. Perhaps could've done slightly better for Palace's first goal, but it's hard to tell really. Bassong was pretty solid all game, won everything in the air and in general dealt with Murray quite well. Tettey was solid but unspectacular really, and the decision to take him off on a yellow card was the right one, especially with Mulumbu injured. Redmond had a big impact when he came on. Obviously scored a brilliant goal and was heavily involved in general and it's not hard to see why supporters are a little frustrated he didn't start. Jerome didn't have quite as big an impact, but ultimately scored a good goal that was wrongly ruled out, and had it of stood he would've been the hero again.

Our worst player was Bradley Johnson, followed by Martin and then Whittaker. Johnson won a few headers, including one that set-up Jerome for his illegal goal, but lost out in the air more times than he won. On the ball he didn't really do anything of much good, and his movement off the ball was terrible. The number of times that Wes or Dorrans would take the ball into the middle and look for an option on the left hand side, only to find that Johnson had come inside was absurd. I had my doubts about whether he could reproduce last season's success, and based on today's evidence I'm not optimistic. Martin was at fault for Palace's second and third goal, and just isn't good enough in general. He got caught out time after time, and we really need to sign a quality centre back to play alongside Bassong. I like Martin, seems like a nice guy who loves this football club, but the fact is we need quality if we're going to stay up, and he just isn't it. It's not hard to see why Neil likes him, because one thing that he's good at, and did well today was bring the ball out of defence and travel 15/20 yards before playing the pass, but I really hope that isn't enough to convince Neil to stick with him. Whittaker was quite good going forwards, and was unlucky as well with his effort that was cleared off the line, but he was humiliated by Zaha time after time, and the same with Bolasie when he came on. He was slow to turn and not great going into tackles either. I understand that Zaha and Bolasie are two very tricky, pacey wingers who any full back in the division would struggle against, but the fact is that is what we're up against this season, and today he didn't look up to it. Grabban blew hot and cold. Some of his link-up play, in particular with Hoolahan in the first half was very good, but that some of it wasn't so good, and he gave the ball away a fair few times. He was also prepared to run the lines which he did reasonably well. I think that people's judgement of his performance has been clouded by that miss in the first half. He wasn't great but he certainly wasn't as bad as some (not really anyone on here, mainly those on Twitter and Canary Call) are making out. The fact is though that in this league you cannot afford to miss chances like that. They are few and far between so when they come your way you really need to take them, and Grabban didn't, and that has always been the problem with him which we all witnessed clearly last season. For me Jerome is the superior player, and if he was fully fit I would've started with him. But the way that Grabban has been written off as 'not good enough' after one Premier League game, where he was by no means our worst player is ridiculous.

I think Alex Neil did reasonably well on his Premier League debut despite the defeat. When I saw the starting line-up I was slightly disappointed, and surprised that he chose to leave out Jerome and Redmond. But I actually think it was a good call. Although it's seen as quite unambitious and negative to play with four central midfielders in a home game against a mid-table team, it was actually working well for us in the first 25 minutes or so, and we were certainly on top. The reason we lost this game was completely down to the defence, nothing to do with the midfield, or rather the fact that Redmond was omitted from it. If we defended better for the first two goals and therefore we don't concede them, then we would've gone onto win the game regardless of the fact that Redmond or Jerome didn't start. Ok, you could argue that Jerome would've stuck Grabban's chance away, but had defended properly I'm sure we would've won the game regardless of that miss. Neil also made exactly the right changes at the right times. I imagine what he was thinking at half time is to leave any substitutions until the hour mark, and if it's still 1-0 then bring on Redmond and Jerome. It was just unfortunate that we turned off from a set-piece and ended up 2-0 down and with a mountain to climb before he could make those changes, but having gone 2-0 down he made them immediately. Had it stayed 1-0 until the hour mark and Redmond and Jerome had come on, I would've been much more confident we could get something from the game. The decision to bring on Hooper for Dorrans with about 10 minutes left was also the correct call, it was just unfortunate that we couldn't really break Palace down and therefore Hooper wasn't really able to get in the game.

As for the referee, what a ****. It is so typical that we get the ref who happens to have never managed in the Premier League before, and you can clearly see why. I didn't get a clear enough view of the penalty appeal for handball because I sit at the other end of the ground, but I have seen Palace fans say they were lucky to get away with it. There is absolutely nothing wrong with Jerome's goal though, and to rule it out for dangerous play is beyond ridiculous. Not only does Ward put his head downwards, but he's behind Jerome, so the only way Jerome's foot can hit Ward is if Ward goes towards it. Just in general though he had a terrible game. Let Palace get away with so much without brandishing a card, and there was absolutely no consistency in the way he did things, for example booking Tettey for bringing down Zaha, and yet a few minutes earlier McArthur went in two footed on Hoolahan, with both feet off the ground, and didn't even get a card. It was unbelievably bad, and I hope he never manages in the Premier League again.

Anyway, onto Sunderland away, which is certainly a game that falls into the 'winnable' category. A lot of supporters seem to be panicking over this defeat, but it's only one bloody game, where we came up against a good side and actually didn't play too badly, not to mention being let down by the referee. There's a long way to go yet and a win against Sunderland (and possibly a signing of a striker or centre back during the week) and suddenly all the fans that have stated how doomed we are after this defeat, will suddenly think we'll be in with a chance of a Champions League place again. 
And I thought I made long posts! I'll save this one for tomorrow!
 
KeiranShikari

KeiranShikari

New Member
I enjoy your posts and usually agree with you but I am mystified by this one.  If Ricky had done what Grabban did in the first half the he would have been run out of town.  He was slow to react: often literally a bystander just standing and watching play around him and his first touch was woeful with him conceding possession as the ball cannoned away from him,   He is hardly any stronger and was easily pushed off the ball.   The game was crying out for Jerome's stronger approach and the difference was evident when he came on.
My biggest problem with Grabban today was that when he was out wide the likes of Dorrans and Howson weren't getting into the box as much as they should have. Had RVW performed as Grabban did today [it was similar to his performance vs West Ham] it would have been had the same response from me. 

I agree that it needed the more direct approach from either Jerome or Redmond. I do wonder if the Mulumbu injury caused Neil to go a little more packed in midfield today. 
 
The Great Mass Debater

The Great Mass Debater

New Member
I also think that Jerome will soon win his place back as our main striker
I dont understand why he ever lost it. Top scorer last season, has looked good in pre-season, and offers more than Grabban in almost every way. Jerome was one of our stand-out performers last season and we were so much better after he came on.

I said a few weeks ago that as far as I was concerned the shirt was Jerome's to lose and I stand by that. I really dont understand why Grabban was preferred. Jerome should have started and its up to the others to displace him
 
The Great Mass Debater

The Great Mass Debater

New Member
My biggest problem with Grabban today was that when he was out wide the likes of Dorrans and Howson weren't getting into the box as much as they should have. Had RVW performed as Grabban did today [it was similar to his performance vs West Ham] it would have been had the same response from me. 

I agree that it needed the more direct approach from either Jerome or Redmond. I do wonder if the Mulumbu injury caused Neil to go a little more packed in midfield today. 
This reminded me of when we played with Holt or Morison as lone striker. Far too often they'd end up being the one crossing in to an empty box, or to the big man Hoolahan. Always a problem. Grabban's movement is often praised - but it has to get you somewhere. At least when Holt and Morison played together they could hit each other in the box
 
G

GJP

Well-Known Member
Overall, I think AN picked a team not to get beat and I just don't think we can do that in the Prem. You can't leave your biggest weapons (Jerome and Redmond) on the bench and hope to get anything.

Pretty much every team in this league can throw a punch. You've got to make sure you can punch harder than at least three other teams. 
 
G

GJP

Well-Known Member
Just seen Russell Martin jump and turn his back on a through ball. Jesus *bleep* Christ on a pogo stick.
Look at the goals we conceded towards the end of the season - against Ipswich (both legs),against Fulham, against Rotherham and maybe one or two more. All of those last few goals we let in had Martin messing up or coming up short.

But I just can't see us dropping him.
 
ZLF

ZLF

Well-Known Member
playing 7/8 prem quality players isnt enough;  we need a full complement to succeed.   the lack of quality finishing but more crucially the persistently weak defensive right side needs strengthening

3 transfer weeks left;  so much more crucial to strengthen, not just striker but that comical defence, than todays result.  and the players lost it for us today,  not the novice ref who did make bad decisions
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Canaryboy

Canaryboy

Well-Known Member
Just seen Russell Martin jump and turn his back on a through ball. Jesus *bleep* Christ on a pogo stick.
Was also lucky that Murray was half a foot offside when he pulled him down in the box.
 
G

GJP

Well-Known Member
Was also lucky that Murray fired straight at Ruddy after Cabaye (iirc) hit a ball into the middle of the defence and Murray got in behind him with ease.
 
splutcho

splutcho

Moderator
Was also lucky that Murray was half a foot offside when he pulled him down in the box.
Forgot about that. Would have been off as well. That said, the ref waved no penalty, so that was another wrong decision!
 
G

GJP

Well-Known Member
For the record it looked like more of a "coming together" than a penalty to me. Though others may have had a better view.

But for me, if you wanted to improve the defence and assuming Olsson is back, the first place to start is replacing Martin at CB.
 
splutcho

splutcho

Moderator
It was right in front of me in The Barclay*, Murray had got in front of him and was hauled down in my opinion.

*Sponsored by Coral.
 
morty

morty

Moderator
Staff member
Just watched MOTD. Yes, that refereeing display was awful, but we really, really have to defend a lot better.
 
S

SussexYellow

Active Member
Agree we need to defend a lot better. Possibly we were not cautious enough, but if we are to play an attacking game we really do need to put chances away at this level. I know this is stating the obvious but I counted 6 good chances yesterday and at this level that needs to yield more than one goal.

It may all have been so different if we had got the first goal. We said at the time that we may live to regret the Grabban miss and so it proved to be. That first goal is going to be so important this year.

But credit also needs to be given to Palace. They defended well, got bodies in the way to clear off the line (BJ and Whitts attempts). Counter attacked with pace and when they pressed did so with speed and aggression. They were and will be difficult to beat.
 
morty

morty

Moderator
Staff member
Agree we need to defend a lot better. Possibly we were not cautious enough, but if we are to play an attacking game we really do need to put chances away at this level. I know this is stating the obvious but I counted 6 good chances yesterday and at this level that needs to yield more than one goal.

It may all have been so different if we had got the first goal. We said at the time that we may live to regret the Grabban miss and so it proved to be. That first goal is going to be so important this year.

But credit also needs to be given to Palace. They defended well, got bodies in the way to clear off the line (BJ and Whitts attempts). Counter attacked with pace and when they pressed did so with speed and aggression. They were and will be difficult to beat.
They are a good side, who have significantly upgraded this summer. I think everyone recognised that, I don't think I saw anyone presuming we would beat them.

We definitely had the better of the first half, but they took their chance when it counted. This sums up the fundamental difference between the Championship and the Premiership, for me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top