Bethnal Yellow and Green
New Member
It is of course a risk. But then almost everything in football, especially signings, is a risk."Potentially" the best striker in the Championship.
If we held onto him, there is also a risk he doesn't adapt and has a season like the one just gone. Meaning we've held onto a striker that has not only cost loads in wages, but had a negative impact on the season. That could end up being more expensive.
I think we've taken the less risky option by getting in proven Championship strikers to replace an unknown quantity that will cost us loads in wages.
I think it is the best we could hope for to help the ultimate goal of this season.
I try to look at it like this, if Norwich had just arranged the signing of Ricky from say WBA after a poor season in the Premier League, how would you feel? Personally I'd be delighted that the club have brought in a striker who has scored in the Champions League and been selected for Holland.
So to let him go, for £1.25m, is disappointing.
Of course, Norwich might not need him to get promoted, but if Grabban fails to reproduce his one decent goal scoring season, Norwich may find they need to bring another striker in whilst a striker they own is scoring goals for someone else.