Supporters Charter

[Cackleborough]

Further to debate yesterday if the Club is now adopting blue raw or red imp Capitalism perhaps there will be an AGM resolution to change the following wording of the Charter?

'We recognise the loyalty and dedication of our supporters.'

 

[morty]

Adopting what now lol?

 

[Cackleborough]

Let Donald J. Trump decide.

 

[morty]

Let Donald J. Trump decide.

Nope, you have definitely lost me now.

 

[Cackleborough]

Trump disregards Charters persistently or writes them afresh every day before Breakfast. Fine if you are a fan of him.

 

[morty]

Trump disregards Charters persistently or writes them afresh every day before Breakfast. Fine if you are a fan of him.

Ummmm, whether or not I am, I still have absolutely no clue what you are on about.

 

[morty]

I'm going to assume that, for reasons unknown, you think that Norwich City have broken the terms of the supporters charter, specifically about recognising the loyalty and dedication of supporters. Why do you think that?

 

[Cackleborough]

I'm going to assume that, for reasons unknown, you think that Norwich City have broken the terms of the supporters charter, specifically about recognising the loyalty and dedication of supporters. Why do you think that?

Far more reasons than it would be prudent to detail here for everyone's sake but the clear latest manifestation being the Lincoln ticketing debacle.

 

[morty]

Oh right. You should have just said if you didn't actually want to discuss it

 

[Cackleborough]

Oh right. You should have just said if you didn't actually want to discuss it

What I am puzzling over at the moment in relation to my contribution to the 2002 ITV digital bailout we discussed previously is how in the full knowledge that a male inheritor whose terminally ill dad was able to help him out with a Club benefit, the Club wasn't able to assist a female whose dad died suddenly?

This from the so called family oriented club that is so hugely anti-misogynistic.

You help them in their hour of need but they don't reciprocate.

 

[morty]

What I am puzzling over at the moment in relation to my contribution to the 2002 ITV digital bailout we discussed previously is how in the full knowledge that a male inheritor whose terminally ill dad was able to help him out with a Club benefit, the Club wasn't able to assist a female whose dad died suddenly?

This from the so called family oriented club that is so hugely anti-misogynistic.

You help them in their hour of need but they don't reciprocate.

So she bought shares in a football club, which have since dramatically gone down in value, and the woman in question feels aggrieved?

And you want the club to give the money back that she has lost?

Am I understanding this correctly?

 

[Fenway Frank]

Goodness me this is so cryptic

 

[AmericanCanary]

I think their is times to criticize the club and times when it would be bizarre to do so.

This seems to be a case of the latter to me.

 

[Cackleborough]

So she bought shares in a football club, which have since dramatically gone down in value, and the woman in question feels aggrieved?
And you want the club to give the money back that she has lost?
Am I understanding this correctly?

Dividing shareholders funds by shares in issue in 2002 equates to the share price paid then. Doing the same 16 years later when the event (death) occured gives a price 140% higher. She hasn't had any value at all in the last 8 years and, unlike Michael Foulger or the Canaries Trust, no exit opportunity (the rest of us havent had the latter either). A similar man in our group has at least had the Annual Return as have I (at least substantially). Equitable treatment of shareholders- no way.

As for the Lincoln Tickets if Zoe Webber is so authentic as she has recently claimed she would have posted a News item on the website today apologising for the sub-optimal performance.

You asked the question you got the answer albeit you state you don't want to go down the Pink Un Road but seem to be following much the same.

 

[Cackleborough]

Of course share value has plummetted since then. £100 million loss on P&L over last 5 years.

 

[morty]

Dividing shareholders funds by shares in issue in 2002 equates to the share price paid then. Doing the same 16 years later when the event (death) occured gives a price 140% higher. She hasn't had any value at all in the last 8 years and, unlike Michael Foulger or the Canaries Trust, no exit opportunity (the rest of us havent had the latter either). A similar man in our group has at least had the Annual Return as have I (at least substantially). Equitable treatment of shareholders- no way.

As for the Lincoln Tickets if Zoe Webber is so authentic as she has recently claimed she would have posted a News item on the website today apologising for the sub-optimal performance.

You asked the question you got the answer albeit you state you don't want to go down the Pink Un Road but seem to be following much the same.

On that last bit, sorry, what now?

 

[Fenway Frank]

As for the Lincoln Tickets if Zoe Webber is so authentic as she has recently claimed she would have posted a News item on the website today apologising for the sub-optimal performance

Why would she need to apologise ? If you chose the game as your match pick you got first dibs, then it filters down as usual in the membership groups

 

[Jarrold Stander]

There are times when I wonder if by letting a certain poster loose on here the forum will end up totally strangled by the endless ‘ what-about-ery ‘ the Pink Un endured for years.

 

[morty]

There are times when I wonder if by letting a certain poster loose on here the forum will end up totally strangled by the endless ‘ what-about-ery ‘ the Pink Un endured for years.

Don't worry, that will not be happening...

 

[Cackleborough]

Why would she need to apologise ? If you chose the game as your match pick you got first dibs, then it filters down as usual in the membership groups

You got about 2 minutes flat to do that. Got caught short, boss distracted you, login problems - missed it.