S
Sonyc
Well-Known Member
Absolutely. Likewise, it was the decision also to sack Hughton with 5 games to go that was an odd one because he was more likely to have had the know how to try and get the win we needed (recall the 0-0 draw against Chelsea). I didn't like his set up and style of play but arguably he had more chance to save us that season. Gave Adams a tough job with so little time left. Like the decision to bring in Smith after Farke (going against everything the management had told us was the policy) it stands as another poor board decision.As time goes on I see our time in the Prem with Lambert as more and more of a wasted opportunity. I feel that if we could have just stayed one more season then we may have cracked it. That was our chance.
Unless we go up and Attansio throws about 200 million in...
Easy in hindsight to say but I would have kept Hughton in post and sacked him even had he have kept us up. I would have kept Farke too at the time of his sacking and have been looking for a replacement in the same mould and not just because someone had come fresh to the market (or in Adams' case a rookie within the club). I understand why the club made both decisions but they were poor ones and both gambles that didn't pay off. I suppose for balance they brought in Neil and also Lambert when the incumbents were struggling (Adams and Gunn). Both good decisions.
It's why I still try and believe in the 'strategy' in the Thorup appointment - even so, I dearly wish we'd brought in Will Still (was he available?) because he is the real deal and more league hardened arguably.
Edit: Good to see Wright start. I felt he was decent against Plymouth. The fact he wants to sign also a very good sign. I quite rate him. See Gibbs back too. Such is the strange unpredictability of this season what are the odds we go and beat Sunderland!