I wonder whether we were contractually obliged to sign Dorrans upon promotion as part of the loan agreement.
Like when we were obliged to sign Garrido, even though Hughton clearly didn't want him.
Which only cements my belief that the loan system is another of the ills of the game. It doesn't work as much as it is supposed to. And with the huge turnover in managers, particularly in the lower divisions, the new man in charge might not fancy any of the loanees.
It is all very well for our club website to give us an update on Adam's stable of players, but half of them don't appear to get regular game time.
I am a firm believer in the old system for transfers which would negate the need for loans. All the new system does is create a chain, ultimately ups the price and we have to put with Jim White tellignfairy stories on SSN twice a year.
And I also believe that you should go with what you have got. Players and manager alike. I know we wouldn't have been promoted last season but that can't be helped. The board should appoint and if a manger is given two years then he should get his two years. And barring ebola breaking out at Colney, you buy and sell players the same way as any other commodity.