KeiranShikari
New Member
I'm sure that hitc sport or whoever it was will now report this as fact.I've heard rumours of an ingrowing toenail.....![]()
I'm sure that hitc sport or whoever it was will now report this as fact.I've heard rumours of an ingrowing toenail.....![]()
I don't think personal terms were ever likely to be a problem. Wouldn't be surprised if negotiations had been done during the week and he just had to come down and sign.
Would be typical if they now find something wrong during the medical.
If we had gone in with a bid of 7, they would have held out for 9.If we had gone in with a bid of £7m for him in the first place do you think we would have got him 6 weeks ago (or whenever we put in our first bid)? Is it the default position of clubs to reject the first bid knowing a better offer will no doubt follow? Cat and mouse. I'm not sure however, in this case, which club is the cat and which is the mouse!
Using your examples, then Toffolo and Loza would certainly be on the bench minimum and I believe AN would do that and then posters wouldn't have the need to keep saying "We need a blah blah blah and we have no cover for blah blah blah".Depends on the circumstances.
But say Olsson was fit, do you say to him "Martin, sorry mate, you're not playing the first few games because Harry has done alright on tour?"
What if Loza had scored half a dozen goals in pre season and Jerome didn't get any?
I'm not against young players being given the chance but I don't think they get it just for being there, for having gone through the ranks. I trust what the manager sees in training tells him enough about whether someone is worth a shot or not.
Exactly. Two of my grandsons base everything on FIFA15 and keep telling me who is brilliant and who isn't just because of a game!Sadly it tends to be the default position for some people. The usual response is that players on big fees are a waste of money and those on low ones (or even, god help us, frees) are automatically crap, Mulumbu being a case in point. Very few of us (myself included!) see enough football to really be able to judge the quality of players and our opinion should always bow to the club's scouting network. Of course, players can bomb, as a certain Dutchman has proved but generally, if they're good enough for Alex they're good enough for me.
Exactly. Two of my grandsons base everything on FIFA15 and keep telling me who is brilliant and who isn't just because of a game!
I have a friend at the club who told me all players had a 50% relegation pay cut clause in their contracts. I guess that works both ways and they have all had a 100% pay increase upon promotion.I'd be interested to know what our % was/is, because we have those written into contracts too I think?
A 100% increase would only take the players back to the wages they were on pre-relegation of course. Although I wouldn't be surprised if there had been some contract renegotiations post relegation last year, in order to retain players, in which case it may well be the case that some players are now on more than they were prior to relegation. All speculation of course.a 100% pay rise is crazy on the face of it, but not so mad when you consider the increase in income the club will receive BECAUSE those players got us promoted.
As moosheep said, a 100% pay rise just gives them their 50% pay cut back.a 100% pay rise is crazy on the face of it, but not so mad when you consider the increase in income the club will receive BECAUSE those players got us promoted.
Free to join, free to read. Introduce yourself, pick a player thread, and get stuck into the next match thread.