By using Norwichtalk.com services you agree to our Cookies Use and Data Transfer outside the EU.
We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, ads and Newsletters.

Norwich opt out of midweek broadcasting initiative....

Canaryboy

Canaryboy

Well-Known Member
For the Blackburn game at least. 

All Championship clubs have been hooked up by a new fibre optic network, courtesy of the football league, which allows them to beam back midweek away games at minimal cost. 

So clubs can come to an arrangement between themselves to beam a game live to the away teams stadium, presumably the away team pays the home team money for the privilege, and then charges their fans to watch the game. This is currently only an option for midweek games (and good, people that's when the majority of fans have a good excuse to not go).

On Tuesday 19th August the first beam back will happen, Brighton fans will be able to watch their away game against Leeds at the Amex, and a couple of other teams have come to arrangements for future away games.

On the Blackburn Rovers website they claim to have made an offer to Norwich to beam back our midweek game to Ewood Park, on a reciprocal basis (our game at Ewood park is also midweek, in February). 

"Obviously with the timing of the game on a week night and the distances involved, we would have wanted to help our fans by providing a beam back facility," said Director of Communications Alan Myers.
 
"Of course this would have been on a reciprocal basis for the return game at Ewood Park.
 
"However it is the home team's prerogative to refuse and we respect Norwich City's decision."
 
http://www.rovers.co.uk/news/article/away-fans-to-get-new-opportunities-to-watch-matches-1828745.aspx?
 
What are peoples thoughts about this? I'd understand why we would refuse these requests usually, but with both our games being midweek - we would probably have seen more people at Carrow Road paying to watch our away game then Blackburn will at Ewood Park?
 
Or is the club thinking that they simply don't need the money and would rather have the boost that a couple of hundred extra away fans would have in what may turn out to be an important away fixture?
 
skijumptoes

skijumptoes

Active Member
Does a beam back really reduce the numbers who travel away? It seems like comparing apple with pears to me in terms of the joy/experience.

I could see it attracting more people (I.e. Those who wouldn't travel) though. Can't see how the club could lose and you would hope that they would be pro-active in trying new media like this, especially if it helps supporters who can't afford to make such a journey midweek (time and money).

Makes you wonder how close we are to a subscription based service for your chosen teams matches to be streamed via fibre to an online server.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Andy

Andy

Active Member
It seems to me to be perfectly legitimate to ask the club why they didn't want to be part of this scheme. I suspect that it is an issue of costs or terms & conditions rather than a matter of principle but perhaps you should raise it with David McNally to find out.
 
Yellow Fever

Yellow Fever

New Member
It seems a good idea to me and it'd be interesting to know why the club said no.
 
Keckers

Keckers

New Member
I can't see why the club would say no to this. They would surely cover their costs in ticket sales. I can't travel midweek because of work so I would definitely go to this but it wouldn't stop me travelling if it was possible for me to get to the actual game. And I would guess that I'm not alone in that.
 
Zachariah Lovespoon

Zachariah Lovespoon

New Member
I can understand why the club would worry about lost ticket sales if the stream wouldn't cover the possible lost revenue. Maybe an idea to have an arrangement that these streams become available only once the away team has sold their allocation. This would also possibly make it a palatable option for weekend games as well.
 
skijumptoes

skijumptoes

Active Member
I presumed with the 'reciprocal' basis in Blackburns statement, it was a case of give us rights, and we'll grant them automatically for you.  i.e. we would be looking at gaining any lost revenue with a screening at Carrow Road.
 
Canaryboy

Canaryboy

Well-Known Member
I presumed with the 'reciprocal' basis in Blackburns statement, it was a case of give us rights, and we'll grant them automatically for you.  i.e. we would be looking at gaining any lost revenue with a screening at Carrow Road.
Yes that's exactly what it means, both Blackburn and Norwich fans are being denied here. Would have thought that we'd be able to make back what we lost in revenue with a beam back at Carrow Road with streams being so hard to come by in this league, especially as Blackburn are only likely to bring a few hundred anyway - what with it being a good five hour drive and a midweek game. 
 
Last edited by a moderator:
BarclayBoy88

BarclayBoy88

New Member
I can't see why the club would say no to this. They would surely cover their costs in ticket sales. I can't travel midweek because of work so I would definitely go to this but it wouldn't stop me travelling if it was possible for me to get to the actual game. And I would guess that I'm not alone in that.
100% agreed with this. I can't go to most midweek games due to work, but if I could go, I would go. So don't see any reason not to give fans a choice to watch these games at Carrow Road, I'd be happy to pay a tenner to watch an away game I couldn't get to. 
 
Monty13

Monty13

Active Member
Maybe some hard hitting Archant journalist will get us the answers we want....oh....wait....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
skijumptoes

skijumptoes

Active Member
...They're just having a cup of tea first... And then a nice cake.... And Columbo is on after that.... Oh just leave them alone!!! ;)
 
B

bloodwagon

Member
Strange, why we didnt go for this. hmmm someone needs to ask the question, as to why didnt we.
 
Top